Media practitioners in Northern Kenya have collectively withdrawn from a planned roundtable interview with former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, originally scheduled for Thursday, January 22, 2026, between 7pm and 9pm.
In a statement released on Wednesday, the umbrella body representing local radio stations and digital media outlets cited concerns over responsible journalism, national unity, and constructive public discourse as reasons for the decision.
“It is with deep regret that we inform our esteemed audience of our decision to terminate the planned roundtable interview,” the statement read.
Concerns Over Divisive Rhetoric
The media practitioners explained that recent public statements by Gachagua had increasingly been characterised as divisive, emphasizing ethnic and regional differences at a time when Kenya requires voices that unite rather than polarise.
They further expressed apprehension that the interview could devolve into character attacks or the dissemination of unsubstantiated allegations without adequate evidence or balanced discussion.
“As a media outlet committed to ethical standards, fostering informed debate, and promoting peace and cohesion, we cannot in good conscience provide a platform that risks amplifying harmful narratives,” the statement added.
Gachagua’s Planned Engagement
Gachagua had announced the interview on his social media platforms on Wednesday, January 21, inviting residents of Northern Kenya to a “candid discussion” under the theme: “Every Kenyan deserves to live a dignified life in the spirit of Leaving No One Behind.”
The roundtable was to involve multiple local radio stations and digital media outlets from the region.
Background to the Withdrawal
The withdrawal comes amid widespread criticism of remarks previously made by Gachagua, perceived to link members of the Somali community to controversial business operations.
In early January 2026, Gachagua alleged that businesses in Nairobi’s Eastleigh area, predominantly inhabited by Somali traders, were connected to economic crimes, including claims of funds tied to fraud abroad.
He later clarified that his criticism was not directed at the Somali community as a whole, but at specific business practices he believed were harming Kenyan farmers.
Open to Future Engagements
Despite the withdrawal, Northern Kenya media practitioners emphasized that their decision was not permanent. They remain open to future engagements with Gachagua, provided there is a clear commitment to constructive, unifying dialogue that aligns with their principles of ethical journalism and national cohesion.
Conclusion
The decision by Northern Kenya media outlets underscores the growing sensitivity around political rhetoric and its impact on national unity. As Kenya navigates complex political dynamics, the role of media in safeguarding responsible discourse remains central to fostering peace and cohesion.
